Articles: Family Law Blog

Call the Law Offices of Philip A. Wasserman (661) 294-8484

HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF ONLINE IN DIVORCE OR POST-DIVORCE MATTERS

 

     You should expect that anything you post on social networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, etc., can and will be used against you in your divorce case or post-divorce case.  However, you don’t need to delete all your social networking profiles, provided you understand that a family law judge may read them one day.  If you are comfortable with that, keep using social media.  However, you should probably limit your social media to photos, videos and matters that are innocuous, i.e. matters that are not controversial or offensive.  Dull is good when it comes to social networking sites and divorce matters.

     I recall one former client who testified in court that she never drank alcohol.  However, her social network profile had a picture of her partying with her friends and clearly having a drink.

      A number of attorneys now search social networking sites to get background information, i.e. “dirt” on their client’s spouse or ex-spouse.

     What about e-mail?  Assume that your spouse is able to read all of your e-mail.  So, if you are starting the divorce process, get a new e-mail account. Better yet, if you can afford it, get a new computer—preferably a laptop so you can take it with you.  If you are sharing a computer with your soon to be ex-spouse, assume that you have no privacy and that he/she can and will not only read and copy all of your e-mails, but they will also know each web site you have visited.

Finally, if your spouse leaves the residence, you should still get a new computer or have your computer swept for spyware.  I know of one case where a husband left a very specific type of spyware on the home computer and he could read every e-mail that his wife wrote or received and every web site she visited, even though he no longer lived at home.

This all may sound a bit paranoid, but forewarned is forearmed.

An ounce of prevention in the digital age—where information travels at the speed of light—can be worth a pound of cure.

  • Share/Bookmark

CHILDREN AND DIVORCE – WISE ADVICE

I recently attended a conference where I listed to adult children of divorce.  Here is some of their wise advice: 

“Don’t let or allow your children to lose their childhood in your divorce.”

“You don’t have to have 50/50 custody to be a 50/50 parent.  Quantity of time is less important than the relationship you build with your child.”

“Don’t abdicate responsbility for your bad behavior to your lawyers.”

  • Share/Bookmark

HOW NOT TO NAME A CHILD

The following is a true story. At least those who claim they saw and heard it happen swear it is true.

Once upon a time, a Los Angeles Superior Court family law judge was hearing a case where there was no name on the child’s birth certificate. Mom and dad each had attorneys and they both asked the judge to assign the child “their” requested name.  The judge happened to be retiring two days later.  He warned the parties to settle or he “would” pick a name.  There was no agreement, and after a break the judge took the bench and he entered an order naming the baby.  However, the judge did not select either of the requested names.  Instead, the judge named the baby after himself!  It was then suspected that the parties went into the hallway and settled their fight.

  • Share/Bookmark

PROTECT YOUR PRIVACY IN DIVORCE

If you are divorcing, please consider these simple digital safeguards to protect your privacy.   First: Stop posting on social networking sites.  Second:  Get a new e-mail address.  Third:  Have your computer swept by a professional for any “snooping software”  because your spouse/soon to be ex may be monitoring your every move on your computer and reading all of your e-mails, etc.  This may sound a bit paranoid, but you would be surprised what can be taken out of context.

  • Share/Bookmark

HIGH COST OF DODGERS DIVORCE

Does it really cost $19 million to get divorced in Los Angeles?  According to the March 6, 2010, Los Angeles Times, that is how much Frank and Jamie McCourt’s divorce could end up costing.  As the Times points out, that is more than the Dodgers will spend on their starting infield this season.  My initial reaction to reading that story on an overcast and rainy Saturday morning:  You’ve got to be kidding me!  No way!  Get out!  So how many of the destitute in Haiti could be saved with $19 million dollars?  Of course, the same argument could be made about the cost of an average litigated divorce in Los Angeles, which is $50,000.00…if you are lucky.  Frank and Jamie have hired multiple law firms and forensic accountants.  We’re told that the ownership of the Dodgers is at stake because Frank McCourt contends that he has a post-nuptial agreement that makes him the sole owner of the Dodgers.  Jamie McCourt contends the post-nuptial is no good, and that makes the Dodgers community property, which means she owns one-half of the team.  It appears that the McCourt’s have the money to spend, all $19 million of it, and the lawyers and accountants will help them spend it, presumably wisely.  The Times headline said, “Cost of owners’ split seems out of the ballpark.”  That may be the understatement of the season.  The McCourt’s apparently have the ability to spend $19 million to see who gets the Dodgers, but I doubt the average middle class couple can afford $50,000.00 or more to litigate their differences.  My advice is simple:  Try mediation or collaborative divorce first.  If you and your spouse are successful, you’ll save enough money to fund your children’s college educations and still have money left over for Dodger tickets, a couple Dodger dogs and beers.

  • Share/Bookmark

WHO GETS THE CHILD DEPENDENCY EXEMPTION?

Tax time is fast approaching.   Divorced couples want to know who gets to claim their child or children as a dependent(s) on their tax returns.   Unless there is a Court order stating otherwise, it’s the primary custodial parent who gets to claim a child as a dependent.   The primary custodial parent is defined as the parent with whom the child spends the most time during the year.   However, the custodial parent may allow the noncustodial parent to claim the dependency exception instead by signing IRS Form 8332.   If both parents claim the child or children as dependent(s), the IRS will likely audit the tax returns to see who qualifies for the dependency exemption(s).   If your ex-spouse wrongly took the dependency exemption and it resulted in an IRS audit that cost you money, you may be able to obtain reimbursement in the family court.   If you allow your ex-spouse to take the dependency exemption, and they are also under a Court order to pay you child support, make sure the order says your ex-spouse may only take the dependency exemption if they are current on their child support and there are no arrears owing at the time of tax filing.

  • Share/Bookmark